The upper valley's newspaper since 1888 ::
Search Site: 
 

Advertise on uvsj.com
Click here
for more information



Stocks

Web Poll

Are you going to line up early for Black Friday deals?
Yes
No
View Results



News

Print | E-mail | Comment (21 comment(s)) | Rate | Text Size

Voters say 'no' to Fremont bond

Published: Monday, July 20, 2009 11:08 PM MDT
ST. ANTHONY - Voters defeated a $600,000 two-year supplemental levy in the Fremont School District Tuesday.

The vote was 55 percent against the levy, which the district said was needed to make of differences between what it needed and what it would receive in maintenance and operation money from the state.

The total was 533 in favor of the measure and 649 against.

School Board trustees and district staff have struggled for the last few months to figure out ways to cut spending in anticipation of receiving less money to pay teachers and staff and to pay general district expenses.

After 13 scrappy negotiating sessions the board and teachers reached a contract agreement, and at that time, just three weeks ago, the board voted on the amount of the levy and its terms.

At a meeting to canvass the vote Tuesday night, trustees pondered why the voters failed to support the levy, and seemed to quickly agree that trying again to pass a supplemental levy would not be feasible with such a margin.

"I feel that the voters have spoken," Board Chairman Phil Baker said. "I say we make the cuts. Now we have more hard decisions to make."

The board agreed that voter turnout seemed to be good for such short notice. Some 1,182 people of 6,568 registered voters cast ballots.

Trustee Val Hammond questioned where the district's position had been adequately explained.

"I'm disappointed," Trustee Larry Thurgood said.

The voters defeated the levy in all but two polling places - St. Anthony and Teton.

Trustee James Neubauer said the voters handed the district a "dose of reality."

"You can't fault the patrons," he said. "They've allowed us to build two new high schools and add onto Central in the past few years."

Superintendent Garry Parker said the election results would be a wakeup call to everybody.

The board will likely act quickly to discuss how to make cuts to meet its very tight budget.

Several cuts already have been made, including closing Lincoln Elementary School in St. Anthony and moving students and staff to the Henry's Fork Elementary (formerly Central Elementary) across town.

The tally

Totals: 533 yes, 649 no

South Fremont High School 226 yes, 200,no

North Fremont High School 134 yes, 194, no

Parker School 71 yes, 94, no

Teton School 48 yes, 47 no

Island Park 25 yes, 80 no

Chester 25 yes, 26 no

Diana Richman residence, 4 yes, 8 no

JOYCE EDLEFSEN

jedlefsen@uvjs.com



Previous  
Victim's family wants city to make sand bar safe  

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:
Comment Blog

Will Rhea wrote on Jul 12, 2009 3:01 PM:

" BTW: I am not for only cutting sports and keeping music. If cutting sports is good and cutting music is good, then do it! And if anyone has read my past posts, you'll see that I have said exactly that. We can add other elective programs back in when, and if, the money situation gets better. And we don't need to cut teachers pay or let teachers go either!

And just so the sports people know, music classes also cost more money than just taxes.

So stop with painting me to look selfish by wanting sports cut but not music - it's a damned lie, and you know it. "

Will Rhea wrote on Jul 12, 2009 2:50 PM:

" I NEVER start an argument! I post my belief =, and I don't care if other people think I'm right or not.

The problem is Donna and a few others who read what I write, and then proceed to personal attacks on me and my family.

So if those of you who are sick of seeing me, arguing with Donna and others, then just scan past my name when you see a comment from me.

And have the guts to post your real name when you say something like you have below about me. Otherwise, you're nothing but complainers, trying to justify rude behavior in your mind, by hiding behind the anonymity provided by the UVSJ. "

amused wrote on Jul 11, 2009 11:07 PM:

" I hope that she keeps disagreeing with Will. He thinks everybody agrees with him and she is one of the only ones who will tell him that he isnt always right and not afraid to put her name to it. I agree that sports should not be cut i pay a few hundred dollars a year for my children to play sports along with my taxes and he pays nothing for the band and music classes except his taxes......... I also own a couple of rentals here in St. Anthony and i have to pay the taxes on those properties so maybe the renters doesnt pay taxes but the property owners pay them....... "

Not For Me..... wrote on Jul 10, 2009 2:45 PM:

" Who would want to live in; and send their kids to Fremont schools? NOT ME! "

Enough wrote on Jul 10, 2009 1:53 PM:

" I think Donna and Will should take their arguing elsewhere. We are sick hearing you bicker back and forth on different topics related to Fremont County. "

Will Rhea wrote on Jul 9, 2009 9:49 PM:

" It's true that my boys only use the school for music, but I STILL pay taxes Donna, on my property for the school district. So that's why I think I have a say. That and the fact that I am a citizen.

If they want to stop charging me taxes for the school district, I'll keep my opinions to myself. As a matter of fact, I think if that kind of offer was made, you'd find a lot of people who would take it! "

Donna Lopez wrote on Jul 9, 2009 7:22 PM:

" Will the only reason you use the school is for music so what difference does it make to you if it passed or not? You only want tehm to take sports out because you dont use it but for those who has kids who use sports wants the music taken out first. When kids are in sports parents have to pay money for them to play how much do you pay for your kids to play in band or music? I personaly dont think you should have a say in what they cut unless you send your kids to school. "

Will Rhea wrote on Jul 9, 2009 4:55 PM:

" The only thing that heard - and I talk to a LOT of people is that they would get a $400.00 bonus payment if the bond passed. Which was the truth, not a rumor.

And I for one am glad the bond failed. Now the board can start cutting more programs, and maybe when they've cut enough of them (sports) maybe they'll be able to give the teachers back the pay they just stole from them in the contract negotiations. "

give me a break wrote on Jul 9, 2009 10:34 AM:

" I just want to clarify a rumor that several people have shared with me. I was told that people are saying that the teachers were going to walk away with a $5000 bonus if the bond had passed. THIS IS NOT TRUE. I don't know what moron started this rumor, but they need their head examined. My family are educators in this district and they have taken a cut. They would have loved it though if this rumor was true because the bonus would have given them back their cut plus it would have been a good raise. Learn the facts people!!! I hope this is not what caused patrons to vote against this levy. "

Fremont and loving it wrote on Jul 9, 2009 3:52 AM:

" Generally, I get real sick and tired of new people and ideas coming to Fremont. Some ideas of improvement are great, however other ideas of changing the system are assenine. When are you people gonna wake up? Fremont is about real value. Real people. Real concerns. Real challenges, not quick fix changes because someone had the idea, money. The value of Fremont is not soley based upon money, high california merit, nor BYU-I. The value of Fremont is "us," a working class of valuable individuals sharing a groove. "

Sad for S.D. 215 wrote on Jul 8, 2009 8:11 PM:

" How sad and disapointed I am that the Fremont District keeps putting the kids last.

Sad, very sad! You will lose your best students and teachers to those districts which support education.

Wake up Fremont voters! Say no to new buildings, sports, travel etc. and say yes to the Fremont Co.

No one will move here because of inferior schools! (except for those who get free school, meals, supplies etc.) "

will Rhea wrote on Jul 8, 2009 5:15 PM:

" Support the teachers - it's the school board and administration that need to start making real cuts before asking for more money.

The district shouldn't blame the teachers at all. They have done all they could. Time for those who were elected to stand up and do what they were elected to do. "

education rocks wrote on Jul 8, 2009 4:48 PM:

" I am a little upset by the "If the teachers don't like it then leave" mentality. You are probably someone that bellyaches over what teacher your child has because they are not good enough, but what are you going to do when the good ones that you want your child to have ends up being the one that leaves. The teachers in this district loves your kids, even the ones that you guys don't teach how to respect adults.

I do believe that this district needs to look at all of their options on cuts. If this means cutting sports then thats what they do. Or they can charge higher fees to the parents for their kids to participate in these programs.

I also hope that the board members realize that the teachers were in support of this levy. They, like everyone else hates to see programs go. They have already take a 3% pay cut to help with the expenses. I hope that the board doesn't take it out on the teachers and blame them for this failing beacause I know they were calling everyone and telling them to go out and vote. "

Amen wrote on Jul 8, 2009 2:12 PM:

" Amen to Mr. Reality & Parent and Taxpayer! "

Mr Reality wrote on Jul 8, 2009 1:17 PM:

" I do not believe that the school district has done all it can to reduce spending. Field trips, dances, extracirricular activities. athletics, etc...all these things are nice to have but should be the first thing to go when the money gets tight. Have they done this? Teacher pay should be the LAST thing to cut. Is this what they've done?

Also, the levy was advertised as a $600,000 levy. The truth is that it was actually a $1.2 million levy ($600K for 2 years). That kind of deceptiveness is shameful.

It's time for the school district to face the new reality. Going forward, you will not have what you've had in the past. Accept this, make the necessary adjustments, and stop asking the already cash-strapped public for more and more and more money. "

Parent and Tax Payer wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:42 PM:

" Maybe as a home owner and tax payer, I am tired of paying for renters' and illegal aliens' children to go to school. Home owners are being penalized and footing the bill for something that everyone who has children in school should pay for. I feel bad for the teachers, but if they don't like it, they can move elsewhere for higher paying jobs. "

JW wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:38 PM:

" Dearest Amen,

Actually, I don't work for the school system or something. I just find it interesting that so many people complain about the economic times we are in, and yet don't do anything about it. The best way to get out of this hole we are in is to invest in education. The more education our children have, the more successful (money) they can become. Now I'll come up with an assumption. "Old-Timers" don't care about anyone but themselves. They just want to "ride" out the rest of their existence, and the next generation be damned. "

Amen wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:27 PM:

" Hey JW, while fourteen MORE dollars a month might not seem like a lot, there are families that don't have 4 wheelers, snow machines or other items where $14. MORE dollars per month might go toward a necessary expenditure - like eating, heating, clothing, etc...

You must work for the school system or something.

It is difficult for a man to understand something when his income depends upon him not understanding it. --Upton Sinclair "

JW wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:15 PM:

" I think they should get rid of education all together. That way we wouldn't have to pay taxes for education. What does education really do for us anyways? Nothing. Get rid of education and schooling, and we don't have to pay taxes. That means more money in my wallet. Who cares if the children suffer! I need to buy a new four-wheeler, and the extra $14 dollars a month would have really cut into that. "

Amen wrote on Jul 8, 2009 9:01 AM:

" Amen!

It's terrible that they come asking for more money when they haven't made all the cuts they could. If the people have to make cuts to survive then so should the school district!

If they would just cut the sports out and only have physical education classes, they would balance their budgets like the rest of us have to do. "

now cut wrote on Jul 8, 2009 7:01 AM:

" Now cut and act like a taxpayer when they have to tighten the belt and do without. It has been a long time coming for these government enities that have lived high on the hog for way to long. It is perceived by the taxpayer and rightly so nothing but the best for government agencies.
Just look around at all the fancy cars and equipment some agencies just have to have or they in their minds can't do the job.
Funny isn't it how they let building 30 to 50 years old go down so they can get new ones.
Look at countries twice as old as this and how they still use building 2 and 3 hundred years old. They built them to last and then they took care of them.
Our country is on the verge of bankruptcy and it appears all government agenices want to do is spend more period. Tighten the belt several notches and learn to save like our leaders used to. "

Comments are limited to 200 words or less.

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Home Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 


Return to: News « | Home « | Top of Page ^



November 2009
Su M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
 
 



What Do You Think? We welcome feedback from our readers.

Please email us at editor@uvsj.com
Standard Journal
P.O. Box 10
Rexburg, ID 83440
(208) 356-5441

Please include your name and a contact number so we can reach you
if necessary. Your contact info will not be published.

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.
Copyright © 2009 Targhee Publishing. - www.rexburgstandardjournal.com - www.uvsj.com All rights reserved.
Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.